There are so many news channels which report news to the people. The number is already above the saturation level.
Questions arise here.
Are these news channels honest to the society?
Are they showing what needs to be shown?
Are they in the public interest?
Is not it true that every channel promotes a particular political party?
Aren't people bored of clicking the remote?
When are these questions going to be answered?
People are no position to depend on one news channel for unbiased news. They have choice but not the best. Eventually people are in need of a genuine news channel which doesn't stand on any side and reports only news but not cooked up stuff.
Is there a need of one such channel that favors and fights for the people?
The answer is inarguable and inevitable. That is a big YES.
There are many other things in the society that are running parallel to the political issues. There are many classes of people, such as rich, middle class, poor, infants, children, teenagers, adults, mid aged, old aged, urban and rural like people who live in cities, towns, and villages. A slight change in social equations will show different effects on different classes of people directly or indirectly. The equations may be political, environmental, personal and systemic. No news provider focuses on this data. No one tries or at least dares to decipher the untold data. Then what the news channels are for? Simply to report and discuss unnecessary news and to exaggerate the existing things or to misinterpret politics?
This is the time for a change. An eligible change. A stupendous change. And a purposeful change.
We rethink social issues
We report facts
We retort social evils
We rejoice humanity
We restore the walls of values
We replenish the integrity
We rumble against disparity
We are young, we protest and we conquer.
Those who seek truth will not fear.... so are we....
Questions arise here.
Are these news channels honest to the society?
Are they showing what needs to be shown?
Are they in the public interest?
Is not it true that every channel promotes a particular political party?
Aren't people bored of clicking the remote?
When are these questions going to be answered?
People are no position to depend on one news channel for unbiased news. They have choice but not the best. Eventually people are in need of a genuine news channel which doesn't stand on any side and reports only news but not cooked up stuff.
Is there a need of one such channel that favors and fights for the people?
The answer is inarguable and inevitable. That is a big YES.
There are many other things in the society that are running parallel to the political issues. There are many classes of people, such as rich, middle class, poor, infants, children, teenagers, adults, mid aged, old aged, urban and rural like people who live in cities, towns, and villages. A slight change in social equations will show different effects on different classes of people directly or indirectly. The equations may be political, environmental, personal and systemic. No news provider focuses on this data. No one tries or at least dares to decipher the untold data. Then what the news channels are for? Simply to report and discuss unnecessary news and to exaggerate the existing things or to misinterpret politics?
This is the time for a change. An eligible change. A stupendous change. And a purposeful change.
We rethink social issues
We report facts
We retort social evils
We rejoice humanity
We restore the walls of values
We replenish the integrity
We rumble against disparity
We are young, we protest and we conquer.
Those who seek truth will not fear.... so are we....
No comments:
Write comments